9. Procedure for Monitoring the Progress of the Scheme
Monitoring / Evaluation and Review of the progress, performance, achievements made by a Department supported under the SAP will be done through the following Committees :-
A - Advisory Committee
B - Mid-term Monitoring and Evaluation Committee
C - End-term / Final Review Committee
A. CONSTITUTION AND FUNCTIONING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The composition of the Committee will be as under :-
Vice-Chancellor Chairperson
Head of the Department Member
Sr. most Professor Members participating in research in each of the identified thrust areas.
One Sr. Teacher involved Member in UG & PG teaching in areas other than identified thrust areas
Two outside experts as UGC nominees Member
Coordinator Member Secretary
TERMS OF REFERENCE AND ROLE OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WILL BE AS UNDER:-
The Advisory Committee will play an active role for the full - term of the programme.
The Advisory Committee shall meet annually and the dates of the Advisory Committee meetings should be fixed well in advance so as to ensure participation by the UGC nominees/ outside experts.
The Advisory Committee shall monitor and review the academic teaching, research, collaborative , extension and future programmes; procurement of the equipment; expenditure on housing the equipment as allocated by the UGC. The Committee will also look into the international collaborative programmes, training of the students, use of the research and technology output , patent filing or commercialization of the output, resource generation or patent promotion, attachment of research students and other related activities under the programme .
It will also look into the scope of updating the courses from time to time.
The Advisory Committee may not generally recommend any fresh proposals involving finances to be sought from the UGC but will advise on the proper utilization of the amounts already approved under the programme and suggest such reappropriations as may be necessary, keeping in view the progress of work in the department.
The interest accrued, if any, out of the sanctioned amount under the programme , is to be treated as an additional grant. The Advisory Committee should suggest proper use of such amount. The University / Department will have to submit to the UGC regarding utilization of the interest income, while submitting the annual accounts for the programme.
The programme Coordinator may procure the equipment sanctioned under the programme as per the procedure suggested by the Committee. Since the Phase of programme is time bound, there is no need of any approval in this regard of the Executive / Syndicate of the University.
The expenditure towards the Advisory Committee meetings may be met from the specific recurring grant allocated for the purpose.
If the UGC nominee is absent in the Advisory Committee meeting due to unavoidable reasons, the nominee may kindly be requested to give his / her opinion in case the nominee differs from the decision of the Committee. This opinion shall be considered in the next meeting or by the Chairperson in case of emergency.
^TOP
B. MID-TERM MONITORING AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE
The Mid-term monitoring Committee constituted by the UGC will evaluate and review in the third year of the programme, the academic, research achievements and the progress of the work done during first two years of the programme. This will be in addition to the monitoring of the programme by the Advisory Committee. The Review Committee may review the progress of the programme by visiting the departments on the spot or by inviting the representative of the departments for presentation of the performance appraisal reports in a selected and easily accessible university.
TERMS OF REFERENCE AND ROLE OF THE MID-TERM MONITORING AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE
After completion of two years of the SAP the department will submit a progress report in the prescribed format (Annexure VIII) . The UGC may organize group monitoring or on the spot visit for review of the departments which have completed more than two years from the date of approval of the programme or as communicated by the UGC.
This Committee will review the mid-term progress and activities and also take note of the minutes of the Advisory Committee meetings and the action taken on the recommendations of the Advisory Committee and decisions of the UGC.
The Committee will submit the report highlighting the various achievements, facilities created, equipment procured, staff/faculty/fellows appointed (if approved by the UGC) , utilization of the funds for the purpose it were given, the status of the Coordinator, thrust areas identified or modified, other areas emerging out etc. as relevant to the programme (Annexure IX).
Normally, no financial grant be recommended by the Committee. However, the Committee may highlight any special point or comments which they intend to make for the smooth implementation of the programme, for consideration of the UGC.
^TOP
C. END -TERM/FINAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
The End Term/Final Review Committee constituted by the UGC consists of 2-3 subject experts in the identified thrust area and a UGC officer. This Committee will evaluate and assess the over all progress and achievements of the Department at the end of the tenure of the programme, based on the final progress report, academic and research achievements, infrastructure facilities created and utilization of funds etc. Besides, the committee may visit the Department and assess the Department on the spot, by discussions, physical verification, etc.
TERMS OF REFERENCE AND ROLE OF THE END TERM / FINAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
The Committee will study in depth the progress report received from the Department in the format (Annexure IX) prescribed by the UGC.
The Committee will visit the Department laboratory, library and other infrastructural facilities. It will hold discussions with the Vice-Chancellor, Senior faculty members and teachers, administrative authorities, research scholars and students, staff as may be essential in regard to various academic, teaching, research, collaborative programmes, extension and training programmes, resource generation etc.
The Committee will look into the strength of the faculty (Professors, Readers, Lecturers, other personnel) working in the department and actually in position and their involvement in the thrust area. It will also examine whether the State Government or the university has taken the liability of the faculty provided by the UGC during its support under the programme.
The Committee would examine the stage of development of the identified thrust areas which have been provided support in phases, its modification, inclusion and its impact on the total development of the Department. It will also identify the areas of thrust, where excellent progress has been made or maintained. The addition of any area of thrust, other than the identified area, may be recommended with proper justification.
The Committee will examine the number of years passed after support of the programme and the newer / generic / hi-tech/ thrust areas generated out of the support in addition to the identified thrust areas. Whether these new areas have brought in any excellence or innovation or breakthrough would also be examined .
The Committee after rigorous evaluation may recommend to continue / discontinue / upgrade the programme of the department. The Committee may suggest the financial implications for continuance / upgradation of the programme concerned, keeping in view the UGC guidelines of the programme. The recommendations of the Committee will be placed before the Commission for its approval.
^TOP
10. Annexures
^TOP
Download
Complete Guideline (1086 KB)