8. Procedure for Monitoring the Progress of the Scheme
Monitoring / Evaluation and Review of the progress, performance, achievements made by the supported Department under the Programme is done through the following Committees :-
A - Advisory Committee
B - Mid-term Monitoring/Review Committee (through SAP)
C - End-term / Final Review Committee Committees)
A. CONSTITUTION AND FUNCTIONING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WITH UGC NOMINEES
(This will be mandatory )
There must be an Advisory Committee for every ASIST supported Department. The Advisory Committee is headed by the Vice-Chancellor and its membership includes the head of the department and the seniormost professor from the faculty members participating in research in each of the identified thrust areas under the programme alongwith a senior teacher involved in Under-Graduate and/or Post-Graduate teaching in areas other than the identified thrust areas. The UGC also nominates 2 outside experts as UGC nominee in the Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee must meet at least once every year and if the department is not able to implement any of the recommendations of the Advisory Committee, reasons for this must be documented because the Expert Committee, which reviews the performance of the department at the end of the term , examines the proceedings of the Advisory Committee and the action taken on their recommendations.
The present Head of the Department who will be the Coordinator does all the correspondence with the UGC and if the department is granted autonomy , the Coordinator is responsible for handling the UGC grant. If such a person reaches superannuation or retires during the period of the programme, the next Head of the Department would be designated as Coordinator . If there is rotation of Headship, it should not disturb the programme. For smooth implementation of the programme, a Deputy Co-ordinator may be appointed after consideration by the Advisory Committee so as to coordinate day-to-day activities under the programme specially when the coordinator is on long leave / visits abroad. The Vice Chancellor or the Advisory Committee may appoint the Deputy Coordinator, if not already identified by the Expert / Induction Committee.
The complete Agenda of the meeting should be sent to the UGC well in advance. If found absolutely necessary, a Senior Officer of the University Grants Commission may attend the meeting.
^TOP
GENERAL TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The Advisory Committee will play an active role for the full - term or co-terminus with the programme.
The Advisory Committee shall meet atleast once a year and the dates for the meeting should be fixed well in advance so as to ensure participation by the UGC nominees/ outside experts. For having both SAP and ASIHSS programmes in the same department, the Joint Advisory Committee, if any already available, may continue to function till one is over.
The Advisory Committee will monitor and review the academic teaching, research, collaborative, extension and future programmes, procurement of the equipments, construction of the building for housing of the equipment or as allocated by the UGC, monitoring and evaluation of the research work and achievements in the thrust areas concerned. The Committee will also look into the international collaborative programmes, training of the students, use of the research and technology output, patent filing or commercialization of the output, resource generation or patent promotion, attachment of research students and other related activities under the programme .
Under international collaborative programme, the Advisory Committee may consider well-defined research programme of mutual exchange for sending two teachers every year from the department to the identified foreign university/research institute for a period of 2 to 6 months.
The Advisory Committee will also look into the scope of the courses from time to time and may take steps.
The Advisory Committee may not generally recommend any fresh proposals involving finances to be sought from the UGC but will advise on the proper utilization of the amounts already approved under the programme and suggest such reappropriations as may be necessary keeping in view the progress of work in the department. The interest accrued , if any, out of the sanctioned amount under the programme , is treated as an additional grant. The Advisory Committee should suggest proper use of such amount for the approval of the UGC and this may be recorded and shown in the annual account of the university.
The Committee will look into the modifications of the identified thrust areas made, if any. The experts may write a separate note about the deviation, modifications or problems, if any.
The programme Coordinator may go ahead with the procurement of the facilities / major equipment sanctioned under the programme after the approval of the Advisory Committee ,Chaired by the Vice Chancellor and represented by UGC nominees. The item should not again be placed for approval by the Executive Committee of the University in order to avoid the delay in executing the programme. The programme is time-bound.
The Advisory Committee may constitute a Purchase Committee, from within the Advisory Committee members, say two teachers and a UGC nominee (expert member). The recommendation of this Committee , as per allocation made , be considered by the Advisory Committee and steps be taken by the Coordinator.
The UGC nominees may, if they so desire, bring to the notice of the Chairperson / Vice-Chairperson , UGC, any matter related to the functioning of the departments which need specific attention of the UGC to help in the fulfillment of the objectives of the programme.
The Advisory Committee would , generally , function as a guide and monitor and also act as a liaison between the department and the UGC and advise to promote proper implementation of the programmes and help in realization of the objective of these schemes
The expenditure towards the Advisory Committee meeting on TA/ DA/(Air /Train fare ( Economy Class / AC-II ) for outside experts will be from the programme funds. A separate allocation may be made for the meeting.
If the UGC nominee is absent in the Advisory Committee meeting due to unavoidable reasons, the nominee may kindly be asked to give opinion in case the nominee differs from the decision of the Committee. This opinion shall be considered in the next meeting or by the Vice Chancellor in case of emergency.
^TOP
B. Mid-term Evaluation/Monitoring / Review Committee
The Mid-term monitoring and review is applicable to the departments completing more than 2 years w.e.f. the date of implementation or as communicated by the UGC. For optimizing the efficiency and usefulness of the programme, the Expert Monitoring and Review or Mid-term Committee constituted by the Commission will evaluate and review the academic, research achievements and progress of the work done and functioning of the department after completion of two years of support either regionally or as decided by the UGC.This mid term monitoring and evaluation is in addition to the Annual Advisory Committee meeting with two UGC nominees. On the basis of the report of the committee, a decision will be taken by the Commission and may be conveyed accordingly.
^TOP
DETAILS FOR MID-TERM MONITORING AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE
The department will submit a progress report in the prescribed format Annexure-V. The UGC will organize group monitoring or on the spot visit for review of the departments which have completed more than two years from the date of approval of the programme or as communicated by the UGC.
The above Committee will review the mid-term progress and activities and also receive the minutes of the Advisory Committee and the action taken therein as per the recommendations of the Advisory Committee and decision of the UGC
The Committee will submit the report as usual highlighting the various achievements, facilities created, equipment procured, staff/faculty/fellows appointed (if approved by the UGC) , utilization of the funds for the purpose it is given, the status of the Coordinators, thrust areas identified or modified, other emerging areas relevant to the programme.
Normally no financial commitment will be made by the Committee. However, the Committee may highlight any specific point or comments which they intend to make for the smooth implementation of the programme for which the matter may be placed to the authority of the UGC.
This Committee will also monitor the progress and performance including Utilization of funds provided, if any, under the Programme .
^TOP
C. END -TERM/FINAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
At the end of the tenure of the programme with effect from the date of implementation or as communicated by the UGC, every department under ASIHSS will be subjected to an assessment and full-term review to be undertaken by the UGC Expert Review and Assessment Committee for evaluation of the overall progress and achievements made during the period as per terms of reference of the Committee for the purpose. The department will submit final progress report, academic and research achievements, infrastructure and facilities created, utilization of funds etc. through a format in advance . This assessment is done through presentation of the progress of work by the Coordinator and one or two senior professor(s) of the department to represent other areas too before the Committee. The two UGC nominated experts in the Advisory Committee will also send a Report with specific comments about the department, its progress and achievements in research, teaching, extension activities, its functioning, administrative and financial status for further consideration.
^TOP
9. Annexures
^TOP
Download
Complete Guideline (610 KB)